What should you check before applying to CoinGecko?
| Readiness item | What to verify |
|---|---|
| Project identity | Name, ticker, website and official social channels agree. |
| Token reference | Chain and contract details point to the asset you intend to list. |
| Market information | Public market references identify the correct token and trading pair. |
| Project materials | Your website explains the product and gives users current information. |
CoinGecko listing requirements should be checked against the platform’s current guidance before you apply. Treat the items above as a preparation checklist, not a promise that any one item guarantees acceptance. Begin with the details a reviewer can independently cross-check: token identity, project description, official links and market references. If the project has more than one token or contract, label each clearly and state which one the application concerns.
Check every public source from a user’s perspective. A ticker that differs between your website and market page, a broken social link, or a contract address without chain context creates avoidable ambiguity. Keep a single source-of-truth document for the application team. For the listing service and related preparation options, see CoinGecko listing support and the broader listings and verification hub.
How do you make CoinGecko token and supply data consistent?
| Data point | Preparation rule |
|---|---|
| Contract | Copy the address from the project’s official source and identify its chain. |
| Circulating and total supply | Explain the figures and how users can check the underlying information. |
| Token status | Disclose migrations, redenominations or other changes that affect identification. |
| Market references | Confirm each reference is for the intended asset, not a similarly named token. |
Supply is easiest to review when the project explains the terms it uses and provides a public way to inspect relevant information. Do not submit a number without context if allocations, locked balances, burns or a token migration affect how it should be read. Reconcile the figures in your application with your website and any public documentation. If a figure cannot be verified from the materials you provide, explain the limitation rather than presenting it as self-evident.
For projects asking how to verify supply on CoinGecko, separate the work into two tasks: make the underlying information inspectable, then describe the calculation in plain language. A specialist can help organize this evidence, but the project should own and approve its data. For a focused explanation of supply evidence, use the CoinGecko supply verification guide.
What belongs in the CoinGecko listing form?
| Prepare before opening the form | Why it helps |
|---|---|
| Final project description | Keeps wording consistent with the public website. |
| Token name, ticker and chain details | Reduces the chance of an asset identity mismatch. |
| Official website and social links | Gives reviewers direct routes to project information. |
| Market and supply references | Makes the submitted claims easier to inspect. |
Use the current CoinGecko submission route and follow the instructions displayed there; form fields and guidance can change. Draft answers in a shared document first. That gives the project owner a chance to verify every detail and avoids inconsistent descriptions when several contributors are preparing materials. Keep links specific and live, and test them without being signed in to a private account.
Before submitting, run a line-by-line check: does each identifier refer to the same asset, does every source open, and can a reader understand the project without relying on private context? Save a copy of the final answers and note the submission date for your own records. CoinGecko’s official support site is the place to confirm current platform instructions. If you need help with review preparation, AEOTech uses a named pre-submit consistency review to flag conflicting details before you send the application.
How long does a CoinGecko listing review take?
| Stage | Project action |
|---|---|
| Preparation | Resolve missing or inconsistent public information. |
| Submission | Complete the current form and retain the submitted details. |
| Review | Monitor the contact channel and respond to any platform request. |
| Follow-up | Update the application only when you have a clear correction or requested information. |
There is no useful project-side way to turn review into a fixed launch date. Build your schedule around work you control: document readiness, internal approval, submission and the time needed to answer a follow-up. If a listing is tied to an announcement, prepare the announcement so it can move independently of the platform’s decision. Avoid telling partners or users that an exact publication date is confirmed until the listing is visible.
Keep one person responsible for the application inbox and status log. Record when you submitted, what version of the project details you used, and any response received. This prevents duplicate submissions with different information. If CoinGecko asks for clarification, answer the specific question and make any related public-source corrections before replying. For a separate platform process, compare this guide with how to get listed on CoinMarketCap; the applications should be prepared independently.
What should you do while a CoinGecko application is under review?
| Keep current | Practical action |
|---|---|
| Website and official links | Repair broken pages and keep project information aligned. |
| Token references | Check that the contract and market links still identify the right asset. |
| Application record | Store the final answers and platform correspondence together. |
| Public messaging | Describe the application as submitted, not as an approved listing. |
Use the waiting period to maintain the same public facts you submitted. If the project changes its name, token contract, supply presentation or official channels, record what changed and decide whether the platform needs an update. Do not send repeated messages that add no new information; a concise follow-up is more useful when it refers to a specific submission or platform request.
If the asset appears, compare the visible profile with your approved source-of-truth document. Check the name, ticker, project description, links and token identification. Capture any discrepancy and use the platform’s current support route to request a correction. A listing is a data profile, not the end of project communications: keep your website and channels accurate so new readers can verify the same information outside the tracker. For help with a listing profile that needs correction, see CoinGecko profile remediation.
CoinGecko vs CoinMarketCap listing: what is the difference?
| Decision point | CoinGecko | CoinMarketCap |
|---|---|---|
| Application | Prepare for the platform’s current submission process. | Prepare for CoinMarketCap’s current submission process. |
| Project data | Keep token identity and public references consistent. | Keep token identity and public references consistent. |
| Project planning | Track this application and its responses separately. | Track this application and its responses separately. |
A CoinGecko listing and a CoinMarketCap listing are separate platform decisions. One application should not be treated as approval for the other, and each profile should be checked against its own current instructions. Use the same verified project facts in both submissions, but review the wording and requested information for each platform before sending. This reduces contradictory public descriptions without assuming that one platform follows the other’s review outcome.
Listing and visibility are also different tasks. A profile application is about supplying information for a platform review; a trending placement concerns a separate product and should not be treated as a shortcut to listing approval. For a broader platform comparison, read CoinMarketCap vs CoinGecko. If your goal is to understand discovery features rather than eligibility, see how CoinGecko trending works and compare it with CoinMarketCap trending.
What can the project control in a CoinGecko review?
| Within the project’s control | Outside the project’s control |
|---|---|
| Accuracy and clarity of submitted information | CoinGecko’s eligibility assessment and review decision |
| Availability of public evidence and working links | The platform’s response time and any further review |
| Prompt, relevant replies to platform requests | Whether or when a profile is published |
CoinGecko makes the decision on whether a submitted asset meets its current criteria, and only the platform controls its review queue and publication. No outside adviser can promise approval or a specific listing date; our work is the agreed preparation, consistency review and submission support.
At AEOTech, the kickoff checklist assigns an owner to each project fact, and the pre-submit consistency review checks that the application, website and linked sources agree. The handoff includes the final submission record and a concise list of any open items for the project team. To start, send the token’s official website, chain and contract details, current market references, and any draft application. We will review the materials, identify gaps and confirm the next preparation step.
Prices
| Service | Price | Quote |
|---|---|---|
| CoinGecko Listing | from $1,260 / project |
Starting prices in USD. Custom bundles and volume discounts on request. Payment in USDT, USDC, BTC, ETH, SOL, TON or your project token.
How it works
- Build the source-of-truth sheetCollect the project description, token identity, official links, market references and supply explanation. Assign an owner to each item.
- Check public consistencyCompare the sheet with the website, social channels and token references. Fix mismatches before starting the application.
- Review the current formUse CoinGecko’s current submission instructions and draft answers for internal approval before sending.
- Submit and log the recordRetain the final answers, submission date and the contact channel used so the team has one reference point.
- Respond and verifyAnswer platform questions with relevant evidence. If a profile appears, compare its visible details with the approved project information.
Frequently asked questions
What are the CoinGecko listing requirements?
Start with the platform’s current instructions, then prepare clear project information, accurate token identifiers, accessible official links and verifiable market and supply references. These are readiness checks, not a substitute for CoinGecko’s assessment. Confirm that each public source refers to the same asset before you submit.
How do I submit a CoinGecko listing application?
Use CoinGecko’s current application route and follow the form instructions shown there. Draft the answers first, confirm the project owner approves them, test every link and save a copy of the final submission. Check the CoinGecko listing service if you want structured preparation support.
How long does CoinGecko take to review a listing?
Plan for a variable review period rather than a fixed date. The project controls how quickly it prepares complete information and answers follow-up questions, but CoinGecko controls its review and publication schedule. Keep launch communications flexible until the profile is visible.
How do I verify token supply for a CoinGecko application?
Explain the supply terms you use, show where relevant information can be checked, and reconcile the figures with your website and other public materials. If locks, allocations or a migration affect interpretation, state that clearly. The supply verification guide covers how to organize supporting information.
Can someone guarantee that CoinGecko will approve my token?
No. CoinGecko decides whether an application meets its current criteria and when a profile is published. An adviser can check the application for consistency, organize evidence and help prepare responses, but cannot make the platform’s decision.
How much does CoinGecko listing support cost?
Hands-on application preparation is from $1,260 / project. The work should be scoped around the materials you already have and the support you need. See CoinGecko listing pricing for the related pricing information.
Should I apply to CoinGecko and CoinMarketCap at the same time?
You can prepare both applications in parallel if the project facts are ready, but treat them as separate submissions with separate records. Reuse verified facts, then check each platform’s current instructions and answer its form independently. Do not assume a decision on one platform determines the other.
Tell us about your project
Answer four quick questions and a manager will send you a plan, timing and a price range within the hour. Everything stays confidential.
Loading the form…